Halden Doerge and Ry Siggelkow have a post up called The End of Ecumenism. It’s quite an interesting and provocative little piece, detailing three approaches to Christian disunity: (i) the approach which thinks dialogue at “official” levels and the production of doctrinal documents is the solution; (ii) the approach which focuses on local congregations and sharing between denominational bodies; and (iii) their own, an approach which recognizes that in Christ we are all actually one, and so any attempt at “ecumenism as negotiation” is disobedience. The solution is to refuse to recognize false boundaries (i.e., those not really there in Christ) and to welcome our brothers and sisters in love. I have to disagree: it seems the breaking of the wall between Jew and Gentiles–which Doerge and Siggelkow have as a theological backdrop–did not happen simply by ignoring the boundary or proclaiming it null and void in Christ; rather, they both worked toward doctrinal agreement (Acts 15) and learned to share life together in local, common life. They did this, of course, because they saw their disunity as really null and void in Christ. Nevertheless, it is a helpful little piece to get one thinking.
The End of Ecumenism
March 26, 2011 by Steve Harris
Advertisement
Posted in Ecumenism | 4 Comments
4 Responses
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
The Author
A graduate student in theology, this blog simply details the meandering traces of my pilgrimage in attempted faithfulness of thought.Places of Wonder
- David Goa Q&A
- Duke Resources for Reconciliation
- Edward Burtynsky
- Ekklesia Project
- Henri Nouwen Society
- How the World Lost its Story (Robert Jenson)
- La Blogotheque
- New Monasticism
- Noise Trade
- Rafael Anton Irisarri
- Relational Tithe
- Saint John's Bible
- Talkin' Union: 3000 Years
- The Simple Way
- What Africa Can Teach the North (Peter Leithart)
Voices
- Church and Pomo Culture
- cinemascapes
- Der Evangelische Theologe
- ellipses.
- Faith and Theology
- flores y canto
- Gestalt Theology
- Heart & Minds Books
- Medieval Leftist
- Memoria Dei
- Object-Oriented Philosophy
- Paul J. Griffiths
- Per Caritatem
- Per Crucem ad Lucem
- Tala Azar Strauss
- Theology Out of Bounds
- This Side of Sunday
- Tyler Atkinson
- what is past is prologue

A Thought
“For if someone experiences love towards the Word, and if he enjoys hearing, speaking, thinking, lecturing, and writing about Christ, he should know that this is not a work of human will or reason but a gift of the Holy Spirit.”
– Martin Luther
Category Cloud
1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2 Timothy Abraham Academia Aelred of Rievaulx African Theology Amos Anabaptists Anselm Anthropology Aristotle Art Athanasius Augustine Baptists Bernard Lonergan Bernard of Clairvaux Blaise Pascal Blogging Bonaventure Brian McLaren Catholic Catechism Catholicism Celibacy Child Abuse Crisis Christian Calendar Christology Clark Pinnock Community Conferences Creation Critical Theory Culture David Bentley Hart Deuteronomy Diadochos of Photiki Dietrich Bonhoeffer Disability Doctrine of Scripture Donald Miller Eastern Orthodoxy Ecclesiology Economics Ecumenism Education Emerging Church Emmanuel Lévinas Empire Environment Ephesians Epiphanius of Salamis Epistemology Eschatology Ethics Eugene Peterson Evangelicalism Ezekiel Faith-Hope-Love Forgiveness Francis of Assisi French Globalization Greek Hans Urs von Balthasar Henri Nouwen Hilary of Poitiers History Iconography Identity Immanuel Kant Interfaith Irenaeus Jacques Derrida Janet Martin Soskice Jean-Luc Marion Jean-Luc Nancy Jeremiah Johann Georg Hamann John John Calvin John Caputo John Cassian John Henry Newman John Locke John Milbank John of Karpathos John of Ruysbroeck Julian of Norwich Justice Justification Jürgen Moltmann Karen Kilby Karl Barth Karl Rahner Kiko Argüello Kingdom of God Lamentations Language Latin Leviticus Linda Woodhead Liturgical Theology Luke Mariology Mark Marriage Martin Luther Matthew Maurice Blondel Maximus the Confessor Medicine Memory Method Miroslav Volf Miscellaneous Missiology Mysticism N.T. Wright Nahum Nehemiah Neocalvinism New Monasticism Oliver O'Donovan Oscar Romero Pacifism Pauline Theology Paul Tillich Pentecostalism Personal Life Personal Poetry Peter Rollins Philippians Philokalia Plato Pneumatology Politics Pope Benedict XVI Post-Secular Poverty Predestination Providence Psalms Publications Quentin Meillassoux Radical Orthodoxy Redeemer UC Relationship Theory Rob Bell Romans Rowan Williams Sacramental Theology Salvation Army Sarah Coakley Second Temple Judaism Shane Claiborne Slavoj Žižek Social Justice Soteriology Speculative Realism Spiritual Theology Stanley Hauerwas Subjectivity Systematics Søren Kierkegaard Theological Interpretation Theology of Life Theology of Suffering Thomas Aquinas Thomas Merton Tony Jones Torture Translations Trinity Vatican I Walter Brueggemann Why I Love... William of St. Thierry William T. Cavanaugh Wisdom Wolfhart Pannenberg World IssuesArchives
- September 2011 (3)
- August 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (7)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (7)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (3)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (10)
- March 2010 (19)
- February 2010 (8)
- January 2010 (5)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (3)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (5)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (2)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (8)
- January 2008 (7)
- December 2007 (6)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (3)
- August 2007 (6)
- July 2007 (7)
- June 2007 (7)
- May 2007 (8)
- April 2007 (4)
- March 2007 (14)
- February 2007 (17)
- January 2007 (17)
- December 2006 (19)
- November 2006 (7)
- October 2006 (2)
- September 2006 (8)
- August 2006 (5)
I have to agree with you in disagreeing with their post. I think that some of the commenters were onto something in saying that the authors basically tried to impose their own free church ecclesiology on all other Christians by using the name of Jesus Christ and demanding action in accordance with their own ecclesiology at the expense of those who sincerely disagree with it – not a fair move, in my opinion. I could be wrong, but I would think that Roman Catholics who make similarly exclusive claims about ecclesiology in relation to the person of Christ don’t usually make the equal and opposite aggressive practical claim that “Protestants are just Catholics who don’t know it yet and should submit to the magisterium – now!”
Ha! Nice flourish at the end there. And yeah, sounds like those commenters are onto something.
I agree with your assessment, Steve. Halden and Ry just provide an ecumenism by force; a force that is situated in their conception of what “in Christ” entails (and of course, then their’s always the question of “which Christ” lurking around as well).
*there is